From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200703201930.l2KJUre08585@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Second try for roadmap.html
In-Reply-To: <45EE0DBE.7000708@commandprompt.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:30:53 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> > Here is a link to the patch you posted:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2007-02/msg00278.php
> >
> > Here is my commit which includes those same dates:
> > http://gborg.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/portal/template/en/developer/roadmap.html.diff?r1=1.8;r2=1.9;cvsroot=pgweb
> >
> > Here is you saying that what I committed was incorrect:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2007-03/msg00008.php
> >
> > Not sure what else to add to this... 
> >   
> Heh nothing. I think what I "read" was JoshB's dates which were clearly 
> wrong. I apologize if that is the case. I am out of town and thus
> may not be paying as close attention as I should. The current update 
> looks good, thanks Robert.

Now that I am back from vacation, I wanted to clarify my "concern" on
this issue.  I wasn't worried about any individuals involved.  I know
everyone is doing the best they can.

I was concerned whether we had an adequate process in place.  For
example, should we be supplying patches to the www team so the changes
we want are clearer?  I certainly would not make complex changes to the
C code based on instructions like "Add a variable to the top of function
X".

Anyway, it seems the people involved feel we don't need to change the
process, so I will go back to not being concerned.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +