public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:57:46 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people
> moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time
> to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the
> two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe
> recruit a few more moderators?
I also think we have different sets of moderators for different lists, because some seen to have better response times. But I could be mistaken on that since
I've made no actual check on that ;) I've asked for a list of who moderates what to be documented somewhere, but nothing yet. That would be a good starting
point to see if we need more moderators.
I've also had a commit message moderated because it contained the c word that is in c-handler. Apart from having that approved, I think that specific check is
stupid and should be removed. If possible, all checks on commit messages should be excluded.
/Magnus
view thread (46+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox