Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:27:02 +0200
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists
Message-ID: <20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net>
References: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people
> > moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time
> > to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the
> > two-or-three-day range :-(.  What can be done to improve that?  Maybe
> > recruit a few more moderators?
> 
> Which lists are slow? I tend to moderate in real time whilst I'm awake,
> or at least the next time I check my mail when not (which is invariably
> only a few hours away). I can probably add another couple to my list if
> that would help.

In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
was referring to, also -hackers.

(I did bug you about -patches and -committers, which you said you couldn't
do :-P)

//Magnus