Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654C29FB52D; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:03:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22654-01; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:03:38 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C0A9FB50D; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:03:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-221-221-161.bk12-dsl.surnet.cl [201.221.221.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3BD3gjt031835; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:03:42 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 556B3329F4; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:03:40 -0400 (CLT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:03:40 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists Message-ID: <20070411130340.GB4896@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.5, clamav-milter version 0.88.5 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:03:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/46 X-Sequence-Number: 11796 Dave Page wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people > > moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time > > to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the > > two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe > > recruit a few more moderators? > > Which lists are slow? I tend to moderate in real time whilst I'm awake, > or at least the next time I check my mail when not (which is invariably > only a few hours away). I can probably add another couple to my list if > that would help. What do people use to moderate? Are there any scripts to help or something? I've seen people wasting time hitting reply, writing "accept", etc, which consumes a lot of time. (FWIW I do have a script, which currently only works for pgsql-es-ayuda but I think it could be easily generalized). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support