Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFBB9FB72D; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:10:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58935-07-4; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:10:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DB29FB794; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:10:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-221-221-161.bk12-dsl.surnet.cl [201.221.221.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3BGAIQ4004375; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:10:19 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B73CE329F4; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:10:15 -0400 (CLT) Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:10:15 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists Message-ID: <20070411161015.GB8704@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <7550.1176268648@sss.pgh.pa.us> <461C918A.4040701@postgresql.org> <20070411082702.GA1810@svr2.hagander.net> <14128.1176301582@sss.pgh.pa.us> <6EFFA29CD4051EFDB87937F6@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6EFFA29CD4051EFDB87937F6@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.5, clamav-milter version 0.88.5 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:10:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/53 X-Sequence-Number: 11803 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I checked both of those last night when you reported it ... there was one spam > in -bugs and a few from Kris Kennedy in -hackers, but that was it ... I think the problem is that it shouldn't just be checked when somebody complains, but on a periodical basis. > - --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:26:22 -0400 Tom Lane > wrote: > > > Magnus Hagander writes: > >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > >>> Which lists are slow? > > > >> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom > >> was referring to, also -hackers. > > > > At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but > > I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice > > batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together, > > perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention > > to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is > > most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but > > I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly > > likely to get submissions from non-subscribers. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support