Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED959FB270; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81110-05; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C729FA440; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:01:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id l3NH1XK22064; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:01:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200704231701.l3NH1XK22064@momjian.us> Subject: Re: [pgsql-slavestothewww] New News Entry (id: 791) In-Reply-To: <462CE1F9.4010903@hagander.net> To: Magnus Hagander Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:01:33 -0400 (EDT) CC: josh@postgresql.org, pgsql-www X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/161 X-Sequence-Number: 11911 Magnus Hagander wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:59:31AM +0000, World Wide Web Owner wrote: > >>> A new entry has been added to the news database. > >>> > >>> ---- > >>> Submitted by: josh@postgresql.org > >>> Headline: Security Update Releases > >>> Summary: > >>> > >>> The PGDG has released a new minor version which fixes a privilege escalation exploit, as well as assorted minor issues. > >> > >> > >> How come we're not even listing the version numbers of our upgrades in the > >> news item?! A reason for it, or overlook? > > > > Josh didn't have all releases mentioned in the original, so I didn't > > add it. What I did do, though, was to add the release numbers to the > > email subject line. > > I think it's important to include it, because a lot of people have no > idea what we're talking about if we just say "back branches" or > something like that. And I do believe it should go in the contents to be > completely clear. Sorry, seems the announce was approved before I could modify it. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +