public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: Simon Riggs <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:34:38 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:09:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > The current patch-queue process is failing to scale with the project: every
> > release it gets to be more work for you & Tom to integrate the patches. We
> > need to think of new approaches to make the review process scale. As a
> > pointed example, you're about to go on tour for 2 weeks and patch review will
> > stall while you're gone. That's not sustainable.
>
> I am traveling --- I left on Friday. I am in Sydney now.
>
> As far as scaling, patch information isn't our problem right now. If
> someone wants to help we can give them up-to-date information on exactly
> how to deal with the patch. It is people doing the work that is the
> bottleneck.
<snip>
> As an example, how is patch information going to help us review HOT or
> group-item-index? There is frankly more information about these in the
> archives than someone could reasonable read. What someone needs is a
> summary of where we are now on the patches, and lots of time.
>
> FYI, Tom, Heikki, I need one of you to post the list of patches and
> where we think we are on each one, even if the list is imperfect.
I think you just contradicted yourself. Information isn ot the problem, but
you need more information...
I think this is a fairly clear indication that we do need a better way to
track this information.
//Magnus
view thread (98+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox