From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200705021044.l42AiCJ20657@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
In-Reply-To: <20070502073438.GA2495@svr2.hagander.net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 06:44:12 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
	Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>,
	Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > As an example, how is patch information going to help us review HOT or
> > group-item-index?  There is frankly more information about these in the
> > archives than someone could reasonable read.  What someone needs is a
> > summary of where we are now on the patches, and lots of time.
> > 
> > FYI, Tom, Heikki, I need one of you to post the list of patches and
> > where we think we are on each one, even if the list is imperfect.
> 
> I think you just contradicted yourself. Information isn ot the problem, but
> you need more information...
> 
> I think this is a fairly clear indication that we do need a better way to
> track this information.

No, my point is that 100% information is already available by looking at
email archives.  What we need is a short description of where we are on
each patch --- that is a manual process, not something that can be
automated.

Tom has posted it --- tell me how we will get such a list in an
automated manner.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +