Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC649FB3F8 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 00:38:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97877-01 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 00:38:55 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D05E9FB3B1 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 00:38:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id l453cNs11198; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:38:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200705050338.l453cNs11198@momjian.us> Subject: Re: New idea for patch tracking In-Reply-To: <463BEBE4.8070202@dunslane.net> To: Andrew Dunstan Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 23:38:23 -0400 (EDT) CC: PostgreSQL-development X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL123] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200705/240 X-Sequence-Number: 102842 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I will say publicly what I have said to others privately. Forgive me if > I'm a bit blunter than usual. I do not see any value in this at all. > What we need to track are problems to be solved, be they bugs or > features, not particular patches. Tracking patches simply comes too late > in the process. > > I think that your attitude to the use of bug/feature trackers is quite > unreasonable, and certainly in opposition to what seems to be the > majority opinion among developers. It's a great pity that you are so > utterly resistant to use of tracking software. The only reason that this > system, at best a half measure in almost everyone's eyes, is being > proposed, as far as I can see, is that you will not agree to use > anything else. > > So if this goes ahead and proves to be of little value, I hope that you > will relent and agree the use of proper tracking software like almost > every other open source project uses. It really is time that PostgreSQL > managed to advance beyond thinking that email lists are the greatest > management tool since sliced bread. It's just indefensible in 2007. As I said before, I am involved in patches only when a patch isn't addressed. If a new system works, I will have nothing to do, which is good. If you want me to believe it will work better than what we do now, I can't. Prove me wrong. Forget about what I think. Do something and stop talking about it. What I am not going to do is to do 2x more work and get 2% more help, which is what I fear. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +