Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82B79FB3D6; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:40:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14897-08; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:40:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D259A9FB342; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:40:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (201-221-217-243.bk12-dsl.surnet.cl [201.221.217.243]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l56JeJoj016047; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:40:20 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ECCFB32A28; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:40:15 -0400 (CLT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:40:15 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Magnus Hagander Cc: nikolay@samokhvalov.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version? Message-ID: <20070606194015.GG11800@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <20070606164029.GB11800@alvh.no-ip.org> <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.5, clamav-milter version 0.88.5 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:40:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/8 X-Sequence-Number: 12047 Magnus Hagander wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > >> I've just found (via google...) useful (for me) comments: > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-createaggregate.html > >> -- I mean users comments under primary contents of the page. > >> > >> These comments were written for 8.0, but are useful for the current > >> versions too. What we have is the situation that reading docs for 8.2 > >> people don't see these comments -- so this potentially useful > >> information is lost. So, in this implementation the idea of comments > >> for docs becomes weak in general. > > > > The thing to do in these cases is to move the useful info from the user > > comments into the main doc text. > > Yeah, that's the idea. Tom often goes through the comments and puts > stuff into the docs. But I'm sure there are a *lot* of other people who > could help with that as well - read comments, figure out of they make > sense, and submit a docs patch for the next version! Other people!?!?!? What are you thinking -- why would _anyone_ spend any effort in this, if Tom can make all the work for us??? No one else needs to bother!!! Surely Tom is the only person on earth who knows how to write proper english anyway. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support