Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6F09FB531; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:06:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66273-09; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:06:45 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from fetter.org (start.fetter.org [66.92.188.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456EC9FB212; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:06:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 64D4EB62AA9; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:06:51 -0700 From: David Fetter To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Alvaro Herrera , nikolay@samokhvalov.com, pgsql-www@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version? Message-ID: <20070607170651.GA3116@fetter.org> References: <20070606164029.GB11800@alvh.no-ip.org> <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46670885.1050207@hagander.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/14 X-Sequence-Number: 12053 On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:18:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > >> I've just found (via google...) useful (for me) comments: > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-createaggregate.html > >> -- I mean users comments under primary contents of the page. > >> > >> These comments were written for 8.0, but are useful for the > >> current versions too. What we have is the situation that reading > >> docs for 8.2 people don't see these comments -- so this > >> potentially useful information is lost. So, in this > >> implementation the idea of comments for docs becomes weak in > >> general. > > > > The thing to do in these cases is to move the useful info from the > > user comments into the main doc text. > > Yeah, that's the idea. Tom often goes through the comments and puts > stuff into the docs. But I'm sure there are a *lot* of other people > who could help with that as well - read comments, figure out of they > make sense, and submit a docs patch for the next version! It occurs to me that we could encourage this by emphasizing on the interactive docs that user comments are not carried forward automatically and pointing to a place where people can learn how to submit such patches if they so desire. Here is the wording I'd propose to replace the paragraph after "Add Comment": Please use this form to add your own comments regarding your experience with particular features of PostgreSQL, clarifications of the documentation, or hints for other users. These comments are not automatically carried into future versions of the documentation. If you believe your change should carry forward, please consider patching the document source SGML and sending those patches to psql-docs for inclusion in the official documentation. This is a way to participate more in the PostgreSQL project. This is not a support forum, and your IP address will be logged. If you have a question or need help, please see the FAQ, try a mailing list, or join us on IRC. Submissions containing URLs or other keywords commonly found in spam comments may be silently discarded. Please contact the webmaster if you think this is happening to you in error. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate