Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38EE9FB7CE for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:31:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86821-01-7 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:31:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from main2.mycybernet.net (main2.mycybernet.net [209.222.63.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D529FB7E7 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:31:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net ([209.222.54.227] helo=phlogiston.dydns.org) by main2.mycybernet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HyXd1-0005j0-09 for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:31:35 -0400 Received: by phlogiston.dydns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 995D33FAF; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:31:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:31:29 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures Message-ID: <20070613183129.GD1125@phlogiston.dyndns.org> References: <200706092214.l59ME0i06348@momjian.us> <20070610180414.GQ23679@phlogiston.dyndns.org> <200706121304.13914.josh@agliodbs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200706121304.13914.josh@agliodbs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/68 X-Sequence-Number: 12107 On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:04:13PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > This is a good idea anyway. We should have a list usage policy, > and we should link to if from the subscribe confirmation and from > the web subscription page. In addition to letting people know that > e-mail confidentiality footers will be ignored, we can tell them > how the lists are moderated, how to unsubscribe (can't have this in > enough places), not to use HTML mail, etc. > > So, who wants to write it? If there are no other volunteers (I may have overlooked them), I'm willing to. I'm all for a note in the subscription &c. that says we don't approve of, and will not be bound by, these footers. I just don't think we should ignore the poor sods on whom these things have been inflicted. > The only additional idea I have is that we ought to simply strip > away any e-mail footer over 4 lines from the archives. Not only > would this purge the confidentiality footers, it would save us some > space in general. I will support this as soon as you can guarantee that the program to do this cannot, in any possible world, ever have any bugs ;-) A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca Everything that happens in the world happens at some place. --Jane Jacobs