Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8529FB5F0
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:32:36 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 09082-10 for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:32:34 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from locust.cns.vt.edu (locust.cns.vt.edu [198.82.169.14])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0DD9FBC3E
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:32:33 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by locust.cns.vt.edu (Postfix, from userid 986)
	id 738ED118A1F; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:32:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:32:32 -0400
From: Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: 8.2.4 patches?
Message-ID: <20070710203232.GA18997@cns.vt.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200707/87
X-Sequence-Number: 26068

Are there critical security or performance patches that should be 
applied to 824 and how could I have determined this without this post?

Thanks.