Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9571E9FBB41;
	Thu,  2 Aug 2007 05:05:47 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 37289-03; Thu,  2 Aug 2007 05:05:39 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164159FB3A5;
	Thu,  2 Aug 2007 05:05:43 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EA663DCC3DE; Thu,  2 Aug 2007 10:05:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 10:05:41 +0200
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>, josh@agliodbs.com,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "Gavin M. Roy" <gmr@myyearbook.com>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Location of PostgreSQL Performance Test Lab
Message-ID: <20070802080541.GC17468@svr2.hagander.net>
References: <200707310919.10745.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<af1bce590707311136w1dfc4701s195fc0484000f565@mail.gmail.com>
	<46AFDA4C.9060808@commandprompt.com>
	<200707312017.49644.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<46B03A34.8090803@postgresql.org>
	<46B16125.2030800@commandprompt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46B16125.2030800@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200708/14
X-Sequence-Number: 12255

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:44:21PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> >Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>JD,
> 
> >How much of Command Prompt have access to the location? We've been
> >waiting for a number of weeks to get the new pgFoundry machine plugged
> >in and switched on because only JD had access to the DC and he was busy
> >preparing for OSCON.
> >
> >I don't object in principle, I'd just like some reassurance that we
> >won't see the perf machines lying idle or awaiting maintenance for the
> >same or similar reasons.
> 
> Sure, but I have mentioned that this would be a bad time of year for the 
> pgfoundry machine. Basically I had prep for oscon, oscon, and then I am 
> teaching a class ;). This was the *worst* time of year to try and prep 
> something new.
> 
> But to answer the question, I have to provision the power and rack space 
> but other than that we have immediate access to the location that does 
> not require me.

Good - that makes it a much nicer option ;)

But to bug you a bit further - how many other people ware we talking about,
within reasonable distance? Or does the datacenter have on-call people
locally?

(I mean, it's not like we can call on Devrim to go there and plug something
in :-P)

//Magnus