Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:47:17 -0400
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
In-reply-to: <46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org>
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>,
	pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Message-id: <200708041347.18283.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
References: <a5b9f5a05b5dd032d31c3185669fb093@biglumber.com>
	<200708041020.36108.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Saturday 04 August 2007 11:15, Dave Page wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:56, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> >> but opening it up to anyone is
> >> generally a bad idea unless, like Wikipedia, you a) are willing to put
> >> up with vandalism and general subtle mischief and b) have the critical
> >> mass of watchers to keep (a) to a minimum. The experience of the
> >> interactive docs indicate that we do not have that mass yet,
> >
> > What experience is this?
>
> I imagine he's referring to the mountain of garbage that used to build
> up until Magnus and I had a monster session moderating a few thousand
> comments to get them back under control.
>

*sigh* 

Doesn't this suggest we do have mass to prevent vandalism/mischief ? 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL