Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E83B9FB66E; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:45:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71459-03; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:45:04 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10FF9FB345; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:45:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CF12556455; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:45:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1001); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:44:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:44:57 -0500 From: Decibel! To: Dave Page Cc: Robert Treat , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki Message-ID: <20070804164457.GH25704@nasby.net> References: <200708041020.36108.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ViWwB84N1zFtNiVD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:dpage@postgresql.org::My0FYjVjNjkApRB2:00000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000Wgb X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net::y4XZAAY4DML0TkDx:000000000 0000000000000000000000003VIp X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org::3S7YHAFnkW16WhrV:00000000 0000000000000000000000001r6i X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:greg@turnstep.com::OfDiKCNyf1/tMR+0:00000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000008jmq X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:pgsql-www@postgresql.org::WgQVnGGrdnIp4iou:0000000000000 0000000000000000000000003YJ2 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/37 X-Sequence-Number: 12278 --ViWwB84N1zFtNiVD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 04:15:24PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > For collaboration work however, the Wiki is important I think - but I=20 > agree with Greg, we shouldn't need a second one. Can't we have an area=20 > on the current one with looser permissions? I think this is being blown way out of proportion. We're not wikipedia. We have nowhere near the attention level, nor the type of content that's likely to attract vandals. And before someone brings up the doc comments, there hasn't appeared to be much of a flood of garbage there since we instituted the login requirement. It's also completely unfair to try and correlate keeping an open wiki clean with doing the same for docs, because unlike docs we've got hundreds of folks who could ensure that the wiki stays clean. Can we please just give the public wiki a chance instead of coming up with a bunch of reasons it won't work before we've even tried? It's not like it's hard to change things later if needed. (BTW, when I say public wiki I mean one where anyone with an account can edit, not one where you don't need an account.) --=20 Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell) --ViWwB84N1zFtNiVD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGtK0JdO30qud8SkgRAlRuAKCDo5ZBDB42FHsG+Ncu3zShLRhiHQCg1PT7 3HFtGcWyyyk1TcdUBZBnsN4= =3b0n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ViWwB84N1zFtNiVD--