Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5E49FB54A; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:19:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23827-01; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:18:59 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from noel.decibel.org (noel.decibel.org [67.100.216.10]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC4B9FB4EC; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 15:19:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: by noel.decibel.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2722D5646E; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:19:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1001); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:18:55 -0500 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 13:18:55 -0500 From: Decibel! To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Dave Page , Robert Treat , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki Message-ID: <20070804181854.GV25704@nasby.net> References: <200708041020.36108.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <46B4980C.5040700@postgresql.org> <20070804164457.GH25704@nasby.net> <46B4B624.70700@hagander.net> <20070804172833.GO25704@nasby.net> <46B4B9C8.1090200@hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qx/Zgj6HpoLOE58Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B4B9C8.1090200@hagander.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p10 amd64 X-Distributed: Join the Effort! http://www.distributed.net User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:magnus@hagander.net::l7uXVUpa2LHidytb:000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000FQQ X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:dpage@postgresql.org::hWpMKqjUHEwu8flJ:00000000000000000 0000000000000000000000008jYy X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net::Qdh3TQ29zcNrZN4B:000000000 0000000000000000000000004Q5d X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org::/u6P7SXlV0jh/2aH:00000000 0000000000000000000000004osz X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:greg@turnstep.com::lrJ+szH5fPVfEJAo:00000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000EVJ X-Hashcash: 1:20:070804:pgsql-www@postgresql.org::MdclMiT4fLKzZsqV:0000000000000 000000000000000000000000009Y X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/55 X-Sequence-Number: 12296 --Qx/Zgj6HpoLOE58Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Decibel! wrote: > >> As long as that holds, I'm absolutely up for giving it a try. Maybe pa= rt > >> of the disagreement has been from a misunderstanding of what a "public > >> wiki" is. In my book, a *public* wiki is one that doesn't need a > >> verified account. (I assume that you refer to verified account above. = If > >> not, I don't agree until you add the word verified) > >=20 > > Well, at the bare minimum we need a captcha or something similar. > > Without that then yes, we're going to get all kinds of crap accounts. > > Do we just have that turned off, or does mediawiki actually not support > > that? >=20 > I'd say we want email verification, so that we can contact the authors > when needed. >=20 > That said, I have no clue about mediawiki ;-) I have a suspicion that spammers are sophisticated enough to be able to handle simple email verification... :/ --=20 Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell) --Qx/Zgj6HpoLOE58Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGtMMOdO30qud8SkgRAgxnAKCz/sW+kGy9varzD0Aroof+BET4owCdE1yF PeltMbtjRczw+YQnbUlD03Y= =08o3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qx/Zgj6HpoLOE58Z--