From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:47:37 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org,
	Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>
References: <f9cmli$2lu4$1@news.hub.org> <200708081736.26564.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<46B9E4F8.1090005@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <46B9E4F8.1090005@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200708081847.37556.peter_e@gmx.net>

Am Mittwoch, 8. August 2007 17:44 schrieb Dave Page:
> Barring pgInstaller, it's the first bundled distribution I recall seeing
> available at no cost.

That was not the topic of the announcement, however.

> Thanks. The Windows build was written by me, using the same technology,
> and indeed much of our existing code from pgInstaller. Please detail
> what is unprofessional so I can fix both packages.

I mentioned my concerns in the blog entry.  The installer is actually pretty 
neat, certainly newbie-friendly, and a lot better than the installer for 
EnterpriseDB proper.  There is no reason given, however, that the 
label "professional" is in any way warranted.  But I am aware that that was 
not your idea anyway.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/