Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:59:20 -0700
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Cc: Mike Ellsworth <younicycle@gmail.com>, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
Message-ID: <20070808185920.GA7134@fetter.org>
References: <f9cmli$2lu4$1@news.hub.org> <200708081736.26564.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D423022518CA@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com>
	<200708081836.44990.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<46B9FA88.8000809@commandprompt.com>
	<219951fd0708081116v5c761346yc68d72b04ae9ee1d@mail.gmail.com>
	<46BA0C2F.3030305@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46BA0C2F.3030305@postgresql.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 07:32:15PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> > I was under the impression that www scrutinizes all Press Releases
> > prior to posting to the site.  Not true?
> 
> We do. We check them for frequency of posting from a single company
> (so noone floods the news pages), relevancy and appropriateness. We
> don't check they are factually accurate, or try to second guess the
> intent of the companies posting them.
> 
> And yes, I did approve that one - despite my employer it meets all
> our agreed acceptance criteria.

Dave, 

I know you mean well, but in this case, you created, at best, the
appearance of a conflict of interest.  Next time, please ask somebody
not employed at EnterpriseDB to review such pieces.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate