Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844879FC1A7; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:52:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29902-05-2; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:51:51 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from fetter.org (start.fetter.org [66.92.188.65]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996939FC12C; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:51:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 373B0FBC754; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:51:55 -0700 From: David Fetter To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Bruce Momjian , Dave Page , Mike Ellsworth , pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres Message-ID: <20070809025155.GA6122@fetter.org> References: <200708090045.l790jLa20504@momjian.us> <46BA6917.6040804@commandprompt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46BA6917.6040804@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200708/195 X-Sequence-Number: 11765 On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:08:39PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > David Fetter wrote: > >>> If people want to make 'no self approval of your or your companies > >>> items' a new moderation rule, I have no problem with that. > >> Good idea. We have enough people and enough diversity that making > >> this explicit in the moderation rules is reasonable. :) > >> > >> Speaking of which, I'd love to figure out a system whereby I can > >> avoid (the appearance of) similar conflicts of interest in the > >> PostgreSQL Weekly News, as I have been in a position to announce > >> things I've done, are doing, etc., and have never felt comfortable > >> about it. I guess that's a subject for another thread, though. > > > > Disagree. We are not making policy over one person's suggestion here, > > and taken to an extreem, this will slow us down, with zero cases of > > conficts actually causing problems. I would prefer people act > > responsibly rather than add more rules. > > Easy Bruce, this is something that the community is discussing and > appears to agree with. Although I do think the PostgreSQL Weekly News on > is kind of offtopic. Which is why I called for another thread. :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate