Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:58:25 -0400
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Getting ready for beta
In-reply-to: <4707C234.90307@commandprompt.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
	josh@agliodbs.com
Message-id: <200710072058.26383.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
References: <20071005063126.B3587DCC88B@svr2.hagander.net>
	<4707C234.90307@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:13, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>>>> Any objections to the plan of loading the beta docs on the main site?
> >>>>> (No, I don't intend to flag them as "current", they'll just go under
> >>>>> /docs/8.3/)
> >>>>
> >>>> Sounds good to me.  Would the release notes be /docs/beta/release.html
> >>>> ?
> >>>
> >>> Unless someone changes the way the docs are built before then, it'll be
> >>> /docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html
> >>
> >> s/static/interactive/   :-)
> >
> > That would work too. But since we have them both I figured we'd want to
> > use the static ones during beta.
> >
> > or maybe this is the time when we should retire one sdu of docs once and
> > for all? now that we have properly moderated comments I think it wound be
> > a good idea to consider..
>
> Only if there is a way (I haven't checked) to turn off viewing of the
> comments *regardless* if I am logged in.
>
> I personally don't read, care to read, or want anything to do with
> interactive documentation :). Give me what I need, only what I need and
> if I need something you don't provide, I will ask.
>
 Luckily the source distribution comes with a complete copy of the 
documentation included, so you can just build it and install it locally and 
never have to worry about using the interactive version. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL