Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:19:26 -0400
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PGWEB-COMMITS] By xzilla: Allow beta documentation to be
	referenced as /beta/ and allow
In-reply-to: <470A6253.8040604@hagander.net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Message-id: <200710081319.27196.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
References: <20071008162457.4A7A14142F@gborg.postgresql.org>
	<200710081259.22699.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
	<470A6253.8040604@hagander.net>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Monday 08 October 2007 13:01, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Monday 08 October 2007 12:55, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> pgweb-commits@gborg.postgresql.org wrote:
> >>> Log Message:
> >>> -----------
> >>> Allow beta documentation to be referenced as /beta/ and allow comments
> >>> on beta pages.
> >>
> >> Sorry to be a PITA, but...
> >>
> >> 1) Why? I thought we had agreement on using /8.3/?
> >
> > I don't recall anyone actually discussing the use of /beta/.
>
> No, I suggested /8.3/, and nobody proposed anything else...
>

exactly... there was no discussion! :-)

> >> 2) You do realise this leads to the mirror having to store *four* copies
> >> of the documentation, and not just two?
> >>
> >> 3) What do you plan to serve up on that URL once we're not in beta?
> >> Links will be all over the place, so it can't be deleted...
> >
> > had this been discussed, someone probably would have brought up those 2
> > very good questions :-)
>
> Right. so they're up now. If you agree with my concerns, perhaps we
> shouldn't put the docs up under that URL?
>

fyi to those playing at home, i've reverted the /beta/ bit. They were never 
linked to and never propogated, so no need to fret :-)

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL