public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:04:18 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:11:25AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 1) There needs to be a way for admins to flag an item as "don't approve,
> there's a problem" so that if one person knows of a reason to hold,
> someone coming online later won't approve due to being clueless.
This seems ok-ish, except that the example in this case is not one
where it ought to come into play -- this was just a violation of
policy, no?
> 2) approvers should wait at least a couple of hours before approving things.
Why? If the idea is that some approvers are more accurate or capable
or whatever, then only those approvers ought to be approving, no?
This kind of "wait a while" policy does nothing to increase accuracy,
and merely slows things down.
> 3) We need a written policy of what is acceptable for
> news/events/training and what isn't.
This makes sense.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [email protected]
Unfortunately reformatting the Internet is a little more painful
than reformatting your hard drive when it gets out of whack.
--Scott Morris
view thread (31+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox