Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773389FA522; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:28:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91964-06; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:28:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-254.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.254]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E439FA45B; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:28:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from scratch (or-69-34-217-90.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.34.217.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9FMSTgO000776; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:28:30 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:29:10 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Dave Page , Magnus Hagander , Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken Message-ID: <20071015152910.004f1fff@scratch> In-Reply-To: <200710152220.l9FMKad02511@momjian.us> References: <47138DA3.7090801@postgresql.org> <200710152220.l9FMKad02511@momjian.us> Organization: Joshua D. Drake X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.0; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/SFf64=aa6Fn1xi26JwfV5nB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.1, clamav-milter version 0.91.1 on projects.commandprompt.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (lists.commandprompt.com [192.168.2.159]); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:28:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/96 X-Sequence-Number: 12683 --Sig_/SFf64=aa6Fn1xi26JwfV5nB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:20:36 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > The real question is, "is it proprietary". If it is even partially > > > closed source then it really doesn't belong in the "postgresql > > > family product" unless we also include MPP and Replicator. > >=20 > > You know what I mean :-). And all of EDB-Postgres is open source, > > including the funky little MySQL migrator tool in the latest builds. >=20 > Uh, doesn't the installer use a commercial product that isn't open > source? Does requiring non-open source tools to build something make > it non-open source? Postgres requires a C compiler that can be open > or closed source so I don't know if that helps clarify things. Well I think I C compiler is a little different. If the Installer is closed source, that is part of the package and I would consider that a show stopper, because I need a closed source package to install the software... Joshua D. Drake =20 --=20 =3D=3D=3D The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. =3D=3D=3D Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ --Sig_/SFf64=aa6Fn1xi26JwfV5nB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHE+m4ATb/zqfZUUQRAjg+AJ97gAQl2UWqT3fCZLomKa4SSXBkrwCeNG83 pN/Yd2ZwyZ7rTGQjAS4TCCo= =w+Nz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SFf64=aa6Fn1xi26JwfV5nB--