Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450D69F9AEC for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:10:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84058-07 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:10:16 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1D99F9C34 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:10:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: from new-host.home ([71.179.23.138]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JQD00HTAUERSAJ0@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:01:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:01:37 -0400 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case In-reply-to: <20071023115955.39f4459a@scratch> To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Josh Berkus Message-id: <200710231701.37908.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200710231158.28797.josh@agliodbs.com> <20071023115955.39f4459a@scratch> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200710/133 X-Sequence-Number: 12720 On Tuesday 23 October 2007 14:59, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:58:28 -0700 > > Josh Berkus wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Everyone on this list who spoke up approved of the "No more than one > > training event per company per month" policy for training events. > > The purpose of this policy is to prevent training companies from > > messing with our events listings in order to grab the "top 3 spots" > > from the home page. > > > > EnterpriseDB has just submitted 3 trainings for November and 2 for > > December. While I believe that EDB actually plans on holding all of > > these trainings, it is the kind of flooding of the training listings > > that we're trying to prevent. > > > > How should we suggest they revise the training listings? > > Have them submit a single event that states: > > Training events from November thru December > That seems to suck in a number of ways; penalizes companies who offer more diverse training schedules, penalizes users looking for training in specific locales. The classes between november and december have a month interval, if no other classes are taking place during that time, I think it is ok that thier listings show up, so for me this is not an issue. Now, looking at each month individually, if we approve all 3 november events, currently that would knock out the modern course untill the 8th, which kind of sucks too. The tie breaker for me is that it seems what is really important to someone looking for training is the date and location, so that two classes on different continents should not be penalized because they are put on by the same company (this thinking is re-enforced in that we dont show company names on the main page). Also, given enough companies and bad scheduling luck, you can always get bumped off the main page, so I think we should approve them all. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL