Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CC29FA502 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:37:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74258-02 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:36:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from main2.mycybernet.net (main2.mycybernet.net [209.222.63.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04E69F9290 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:36:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net ([209.222.54.227] helo=crankycanuck.ca) by main2.mycybernet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1InYM3-00087w-VK for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:36:56 -0400 Received: by crankycanuck.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B7377404E; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 07:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 07:36:50 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? Message-ID: <20071101113650.GC27676@crankycanuck.ca> References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/17 X-Sequence-Number: 12795 On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:29:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > [ btw, it's pretty funny that -core messages get List-Unsubscribe: and > suchlike decorations ... ya think any of us are about to unsubscribe? ] Those headers are described in RFC 2369 , which says that if you have them, you SHOULD have all of them. I expect the ML manager just inserts them automatically for every list. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin