Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:20:32 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Message-ID: <20071101122032.GJ27676@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<DADF296033D290EF9634F611@ganymede.hub.org>
	<26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20071101113650.GC27676@crankycanuck.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071101113650.GC27676@crankycanuck.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 07:36:50AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> <ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2369.txt>, which says that if
> you have them, you SHOULD have all of them.  

Actually, I just re-read it, and it doesn't say that.  It says that
if you have anything, you should have -help (and at the URL, you SHOULD
have complete information for everything else).  I'd still bet the ML
manager just does these automatically, and I think it'd be a bad idea
to make this list different than the others, since most MUAs can be
configured to suppress certain headers in the normal view.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Everything that happens in the world happens at some place.
		--Jane Jacobs