Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:13:17 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Message-ID: <20071102211317.GX32042@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <B7245D11FCB5AF5EEEAAA436@ganymede.hub.org>
	<472AD296.7070201@hagander.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <472AD296.7070201@hagander.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:32:38AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> We used to have monitoring on the mailqueue length on svr1, that could
> catch these things. actually, I see that we still have monitoring, but
> we've disabled notifications for it. Perhaps we should re-enable that to
> keep track ofthings properly?

This seems like an obvious thing to do, from where I sit.  It's going
to be rather hard to debug problems that one doesn't notice.

> 169 seconds is a lot more reasonable. It's still a bit of time, but I
> assume that's when it does the spamscanning? (sice it delivers to my
> machine in no more than a second after that)

I'd expect spamscanning to be a significant overhead, yes.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens."	
		--Bruce Schneier