Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26909F9821
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2007 15:50:49 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 01742-01 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun,  4 Nov 2007 15:50:46 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from developer.pgadmin.org (developer.pgadmin.org [63.246.23.140])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347249F9820
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Sun,  4 Nov 2007 15:50:46 -0400 (AST)
Received: from [172.16.0.67] ([78.146.239.24]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by developer.pgadmin.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA4JoLXn023801
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:50:27 GMT
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>
To: "Kris Jurka" <books@ejurka.com>
CC: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, "Chander Ganesan"
	<chander@otg-nc.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
	"Kevin Hunter" <hunteke@earlham.edu>, "Postgres WWW List"
	<pgsql-www@postgresql.org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <200711041951040000@204315953>
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 19:51:03 -0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200711/113
X-Sequence-Number: 12891



> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
> To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
> Sent: 04/11/07, 19:28:54
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
> 
> 
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Dave Page wrote:
> 
> >> ------- Original Message -------
> >> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
> >> To: Chander Ganesan <chander@otg-nc.com>
> >> Sent: 04/11/07, 17:39:21
> >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Training events policy ... first test case
> >>
> >> However I do see a flood of entries later from Certfirst. Not to be an
> >> ass, but this problem goes away for the forseeable future if we just
> >> ban Certfirst from posting training events. There is no way they are
> >> running all those classes.
> >
> > Any talk along those lines should not be held in this public forum.
> >
> 
> I don't see why not.  This whole thread has been full of vague, "some 
> companies" are doing bad things.  If there are bad apples out there, let's 
> expose them.  While it may not be appropriate to speak for the community 
> yet, I don't see why individuals naming names is a bad thing.  It focuses 
> the actual discussion back to reality and let's people in the know have 
> some useful information when discussing or considering training.
> 
> Your suggestion implies that instead of doing this publicly a www team 
> cabal should decide this in some back room and not inform anyone of it.
> 

You have some proof they're doing anything inappropriate? Confident a judge would accept it if they sued for damage to their reputation and loss of potential business by allegations made in a public forum?

Regards, Dave