Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F1B9F926D for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:37:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18275-03 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:37:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from base.wars-nicht.de (wars-nicht.de [213.239.199.195]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF459F926A for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:37:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from iridium.wars-nicht.de (Qec1f.q.pppool.de [89.53.236.31]) by base.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430D678417A for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:37:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from iridium.wars-nicht.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iridium.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D4BB1608A8 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:37:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 23:37:23 +0100 From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists? Message-Id: <20071106233723.41f606f4.adsmail@wars-nicht.de> In-Reply-To: References: <25716.1193887595@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26669.1193891360@sss.pgh.pa.us> <47299585.7030402@hagander.net> <47299957.5020605@postgresql.org> <2968.1193919208@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20071101080959.49f3087b@scratch> <20071101152333.GM27676@crankycanuck.ca> <4729F105.30704@hagander.net> <20071101084752.64ac3936@scratch> <20071101171452.GT27676@crankycanuck.ca> <20071106204448.c2eb562d.adsmail@wars-nicht.de> <28131.1194378609@sss.pgh.pa.us> <226C39A675D734B74354263D@ganymede.hub.org> <4730CF84.80201@hagander.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/148 X-Sequence-Number: 12926 On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:37:18 -0400 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > - --On Tuesday, November 06, 2007 21:33:08 +0100 Magnus Hagander > wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >> 'k, I'm confused ... the only name that should be referenced in any config > >> file is maia.hub.org, which breaks down as: > >> > >> Name: maia.hub.org > >> Address: 200.46.204.184 > >> Name: maia.hub.org > >> Address: 200.46.204.183 > >> > >> So, how/where are ppl seeing 200.46.204.187 :( > > > > dig -x 200.46.204.187 > > > > returns > > 187.204.46.200.in-addr.arpa. 18000 IN PTR maia-2.hub.org. > > > > Similar for -1. > > Right, and? ads@iridium:/home/ads > dig -x maia-2.hub.org. dig: '.org.hub.maia-2.in-addr.arpa.' is not a legal name (empty label) And where this came from? Nov 1 20:30:53 base postfix/smtpd[11763]: warning: smtpd_peer_init: 200.46.204.187: address not listed for hostname maia-2.hub.org Nov 1 20:30:54 base postfix/smtpd[11763]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[200.46.204.187]: 450 : Helo command rejected: Host not found; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= a) the ip-address has an invalid (missing) ptr record b) this server is knowing itself by maia-2.hub.org, which cannot resolved (but matches the invalid ptr record) Bye -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. (Ferenc Mantfeld)