Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF212E1D81 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:35:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51381-08 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:35:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1032F2E1C3A for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:35:33 -0400 (AST) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64F48DCCAC4; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:35:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:35:31 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: Tom Lane Cc: pgsql-www@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: Strange anoncvs sync behavior Message-ID: <20071114143531.GE10465@svr2.hagander.net> References: <8844.1193464744@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8844.1193464744@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/217 X-Sequence-Number: 12995 On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:59:04AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Over an hour ago, Marc applied a "cvs tag" operation to the master CVS > repository. I saw it immediately in local "cvs log" queries, but it > didn't propagate to anoncvs AFAICS, because the cvsweb server never > showed it. After I applied a post-tag commit > (src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c a few minutes ago), the BETA2 > tag showed up in cvsweb almost immediately. > > This might have been some weird timing glitch, but what it looked like > to me was that the anoncvs update trigger doesn't recognize tag > operations. Is that accurate? Is it fixable? Sorry for the wait, hopefully this is now done. cvs tag operation should now trigger a repository replication the same way a cvs commit does. (I copied the code over..) //Magnus