Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01742E01E0 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:56:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81179-05 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:55:46 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697B72E01B0 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:55:53 -0400 (AST) Received: by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90B06DCC79C; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:55:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:55:51 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: List types Message-ID: <20080305125551.GO5559@svr2.hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/70 X-Sequence-Number: 14189 What's the difference between "Regional lists" and "User Groups Lists"? I mean, we have persian pug under regional, but sydney and portland under user groups... Should we just merge these? (http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/) //Magnus