Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B1A2E01DC for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:20:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00646-05 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:20:18 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B042E00C2 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:20:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-27-98.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.27.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m25FKfBp019878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:20:44 -0800 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8201647BF8; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:20:14 -0300 (CLST) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 12:20:14 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Josh Berkus , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Dave Page Subject: Re: List types Message-ID: <20080305152014.GS4755@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <20080305125551.GO5559@svr2.hagander.net> <20080305132949.GP5559@svr2.hagander.net> <937d27e10803050550p57c0dfa6q929d2dc922a0b709@mail.gmail.com> <200803050710.59358.josh@agliodbs.com> <20080305151230.GR5559@svr2.hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080305151230.GR5559@svr2.hagander.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:20:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/76 X-Sequence-Number: 14195 Magnus Hagander wrote: > But since the list-of-lists is now in a database, it's a simple UPDATE to > move it, once you're sure. Cool. Should we now have a redirect on http://archives.postgresql.org/, or something? Also, should pgsql-announce be on its own category? It doesn't seem correct to have it under "user lists". IMHO anyway. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support