Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187FE2E019B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:16:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18331-02 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:15:56 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9820D2E0196 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:15:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-27-98.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.27.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BFFs0s016822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:16:01 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 649EB47BFC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:15:23 -0300 (CLST) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:15:23 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Email not searchable in our archives Message-ID: <20080311151523.GK9116@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <200803110329.m2B3Tr204668@momjian.us> <9496.1205206660@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080311111040.GA6767@alvh.no-ip.org> <19906.1205247463@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19906.1205247463@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:16:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/210 X-Sequence-Number: 14329 Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Well, I'm not sure the problem is the delivery either, because the > > "From " line here occured in an attachment, not the email body itself. > > I think this is more a bug in Mhonarc's message separation, which is way > > too primitive. > > Whether it's an attachment or not is irrelevant --- the standards for > this don't even know that there is such a thing as an attachment. Oh, RFC2822 clearly does -- it refers to RFC2045 through 20499, which define MIME. In any case, that "From " line is not defined by RFC822 either, it is purely an implementation matter. As such, Mhonarc would stand better if it followed the MIME standard which says that the message should be split at the terminators defined in the header. Only if no such terminators are defined the "From " line should be used. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support