public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
To: PostgreSQL www <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Another email not archived
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:36:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
This email isn't searchable from our archived either but it is in our
archives:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg01030.php
I might have to stop working through the patch queue until this is
fixed because it is impacting my ability to add TODO items with URLs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This email from May 2007 is also not archived --- in fact the entire
> thread is not archived.
>
> This problem is impacting my ability to process the patch queue.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
> >From [email protected] Thu May 24 22:48:51 2007
> Return-path: <[email protected]>
> Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
> by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l4P2mpw13238
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 24 May 2007 22:48:51 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from localhost (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.182])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AE59FBFFF;
> Thu, 24 May 2007 23:48:46 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
> by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.182]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id 51135-06; Thu, 24 May 2007 23:48:35 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA56D9FBEBA;
> Thu, 24 May 2007 23:48:41 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA479FB93E
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 24 May 2007 23:45:49 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
> by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
> with ESMTP id 93549-06 for <[email protected]>;
> Thu, 24 May 2007 23:45:39 -0300 (ADT)
> X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
> Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
> by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0079FB76B
> for <[email protected]>; Thu, 24 May 2007 23:45:45 -0300 (ADT)
> Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l4P2jH9H029663;
> Thu, 24 May 2007 22:45:18 -0400 (EDT)
> To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
> cc: George Pavlov <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] index vs. seq scan choice?
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> References: <8C5B026B51B6854CBE88121DBF097A86C3A30D@ehost010-33.exch010.intermedia.net> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
> message dated "Thu, 24 May 2007 22:39:22 -0400"
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:45:17 -0400
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> From: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
> X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general
> List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general;
> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?body=help>
> List-Id: <pgsql-general.postgresql.org>
> List-Owner: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=sub%20pgsql-general>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-general>
> Precedence: bulk
> Sender: [email protected]
> Status: RO
>
> Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (The default statistics target is 10, which is widely considered too
> >> low --- you might find 100 more suitable.)
>
> > Does this mean that we should look into raising the default a bit?
>
> Probably ... the question is to what.
>
> The default of 10 was chosen in our usual spirit of conservatism ---
> and IIRC it was replacing code that tracked only *one* most common
> value, so it was already a factor of 10 better (and more expensive)
> than what was there before. But subsequent history suggests it's
> too small. I'm not sure I want to vote for another 10x increase by
> default, though.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [email protected] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list ([email protected])
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
view thread (4+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Another email not archived
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox