From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200803112226.m2BMQ4l26585@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: Email not searchable in our archives
In-Reply-To: <20080311152012.3bd779b9@jd-laptop>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
CC: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:02:25 -0300
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>  
> > Perhaps I should just try without the subdir and see if it works.
> 
> I am wondering if we should bail out of Mhonarc all together. Do we
> actually need it? We have the actual mbox files right? Couldn't we
> build our own parser for whatever?
> 
> As a note, mailman also uses mbox files. We could try its archive
> generation capability. I am not suggesting we move to mailman, just
> that we use and existing tool that may work better to generate the
> archives themselves.
> 
> Either way, this is certainly not urgent, although it is important.

FYI, I have set up a custom Google search site for
archives.postgresql.org:

	http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=008259951665801127283%3A7jpbk6al2qu


-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +