Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6602E0264; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:49:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00213-04; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:48 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D782E2E07; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-27-98.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.27.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CHmmEO028911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:48:52 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BE6347BFC; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:17 -0300 (CLST) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:17 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Dave Page , PostgreSQL-development , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Move the developers wiki? Message-ID: <20080312174817.GH8328@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <937d27e10803121016i45ee2e26g5232151153406575@mail.gmail.com> <20080312102553.23a735a8@commandprompt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080312102553.23a735a8@commandprompt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:48:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/273 X-Sequence-Number: 14392 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site > > has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with > > the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer > > wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already > > over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki > > into a dedicated area on it. > > Not an objection but an observation. The developer wiki seems to be a > catchall for contributors to put various stuff on. There is patch > status, advocacy policies, release policies etc... The developer's wiki was the developer's wiki until other people noticed that they had no wiki so they started using the developer's wiki as a catchall place ("hey, we advocates have nowhere to wiki on; can we use devel's wiki?"). Now that we have a real wiki it makes sense to create separate areas on it for each team. That said, we have links to the developer wiki all over the web. So +1 on moving the developer's wiki to the other one -- but only if the original URLs continue to work (redirecting to the new site). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.