Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5B02E030A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:01:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43259-02 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:01:37 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A6522E01C8 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:01:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2008 19:01:37 -0000 Received: from xdsl-87-79-53-84.netcologne.de (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [87.79.53.84] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 12 Mar 2008 20:01:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19wt7ZIZFJwfzvdyL5VEILVjxCqE8ei1ByEZ9DMFI KkyfZR4mJqrOSU From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Move the developers wiki? Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:01:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Dave Page" , "PostgreSQL www" References: <937d27e10803121016i45ee2e26g5232151153406575@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <937d27e10803121016i45ee2e26g5232151153406575@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803122001.35342.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/283 X-Sequence-Number: 14402 Dave Page wrote: > As you may have noticed > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2008-03/msg00470.php) we > now have a wiki at wiki.postgresql.org that is replacing techdocs Victory! :) > It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site > has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with > the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer > wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already > over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki > into a dedicated area on it. Yes, please. One wiki should be enough. A bit of accidental crossover between users, developers, and other groups could even be of advantage.