From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:03:35 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Cc: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie@gmail.com>
References: <2b5e566d0803131017y22af8ab5n40b0c63b9e31a065@mail.gmail.com>
	<200803142046.23948.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<2b5e566d0803141249u1ab7aa88m206eec9a016d3441@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b5e566d0803141249u1ab7aa88m206eec9a016d3441@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200803142203.36132.peter_e@gmx.net>

Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> >  > pgsql-us-general (public)
> >
> >  Maybe I ask why you need a "general" U.S. list?  What is supposed to be
> >  discussed on there?
>
> We will use this for the same things that pgsql-eu does:
>
> * Discussion of board meetings, strategy and logistics of USPA
> * General non-technical communication related to USPA's activities
> * Status reports and updates on events and progress on goals

Well, that is not "general".  Name it pgsql-us-usergroup or something then.  
The pgsql-eu-general list isn't general either.  It's a mistake.  Let's be 
more precise and accurate in the future.