From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: mailing lists for US PostgreSQL Association
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:07:41 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>,
	"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
	"Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie@gmail.com>
References: <2b5e566d0803131017y22af8ab5n40b0c63b9e31a065@mail.gmail.com>
	<200803142047.51378.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<937d27e10803141252y517cd77cj4f971374d9b311c1@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <937d27e10803141252y517cd77cj4f971374d9b311c1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200803142207.43622.peter_e@gmx.net>

Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >  > My understanding is that pgsql-eu-general == postgresql.eu == the
> >  > association.
> >
> >  Note that these are actually *three* different entities.
>
> No they aren't. pgsql-eu-general was setup following the first real
> planning meeting for the PG EU association in Prato, per an agreed
> action item. postgresql.eu was donated to the group for use by the
> association at the same meeting by Hans form Cybertec.

Then perhaps this should be clarified.  For instance, postgresql.eu shows a 
web page that has nothing to do with a user group.  And there is no 
description of the pgsql-eu-general mailing list that describes that it has 
anything to do with the incorporated European user group.  Its description on 
the archives page, "European PostgreSQL community" would certainly appear to 
imply a much wider set of people and interests.  Also, if you name a 
list -general, then it is general, not specific.  Hah! :)