Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736CB2E0039 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:23:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20437-03 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:23:02 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B76B2E0033 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:23:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id m2KMMs627372; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:22:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200803202222.m2KMMs627372@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based In-Reply-To: <937d27e10803201507ue1fdfe1p7a9310ba5518f357@mail.gmail.com> To: Dave Page Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:22:54 -0400 (EDT) CC: PostgreSQL www X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/434 X-Sequence-Number: 14553 Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I saw your request for documentation on the infrastructure but I don't > > remember anything else. I don't se this as a core discussion because > > the team is going to be more than core folks. > > I've suggested a number of times that we need to decouple all > postgresql.org mail infrastructure from hub.org so it can be > independently managed. Numerous people have been asked the same thing > here for much longer, but have given up because the answer has always > been no. Thats why I've been raising it in core. OK, so maybe there is the crux. Who says "no" unchallenged? I don't think I can, and I don't think anyone else in this community can either. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +