Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E02E0030 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:07:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96958-08 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:07:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E601B2E002D for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:07:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id m2ME7f011405; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:07:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200803221407.m2ME7f011405@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based In-Reply-To: <20080321173522.3afa7e96@commandprompt.com> To: "Joshua D. Drake" Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:07:41 -0400 (EDT) CC: Robert Treat , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Dave Page X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/461 X-Sequence-Number: 14580 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:15:57 -0400 > Robert Treat wrote: > > > > I think you can guess who says no (if not, I'll tell you out of > > > band). I seem to be the only person doing any challenging and > > > without some nods of agreement at least I cannot do much more. We > > > do at least have some more documentation as of yesterday though... > > > but the current problems are with a whole server which that doesn't > > > help with. > > > > > > > If we're serious about doing this decoupling, I'll mention again that > > OmniTI would be interested in helping out... fwiw we helped out the > > PHP project setup thier current infrastructure.... and have a fair > > amount of knowledge in the email department. > > > > As a note to this :) I have a customer who swears buy CMD for > postgresql and OMNITI for their email products. I would have zero > reservation allowing OmniTI to host our mail infrastructure (assuming > it could be community managed). Everyone here seems to be in agreement. So what are the next steps? Setup a parallel email infrastructure, test it, and switch over? What else needs to be moved? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +