Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164752E0038 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:13:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31329-08 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:13:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from roadrunner.wars-nicht.de (roadrunner.wars-nicht.de [88.198.26.233]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287FC2E0035 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:13:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from iridium.wars-nicht.de (Qd5df.q.pppool.de [89.53.213.223]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by roadrunner.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7687D9D41A1 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:13:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from iridium.home (iridium.wars-nicht.de [127.0.0.1]) by iridium.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4703DC83B for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:13:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:13:33 +0100 From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based Message-ID: <20080322171333.0d555dbb@iridium.home> In-Reply-To: <937d27e10803201507ue1fdfe1p7a9310ba5518f357@mail.gmail.com> References: <937d27e10803201455k197ad19y76dd4738dde781d9@mail.gmail.com> <200803202200.m2KM0Jn09866@momjian.us> <937d27e10803201507ue1fdfe1p7a9310ba5518f357@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/486 X-Sequence-Number: 14605 Hello all, On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:07:28 +0000 Dave Page wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I saw your request for documentation on the infrastructure but I don't > > remember anything else. I don't se this as a core discussion because > > the team is going to be more than core folks. > > I've suggested a number of times that we need to decouple all > postgresql.org mail infrastructure from hub.org so it can be > independently managed. Numerous people have been asked the same thing > here for much longer, but have given up because the answer has always > been no. Thats why I've been raising it in core. It doesn't have to be decoupled - but given the problems (plural) in the past, it really makes sense. I remember uncounted times with delayed mails, not just minutes but hours. I even sometimes got answers on my mails hours before i have seen my own mails on the list. The delay was always, according to the Received headers, a hub.org mail server. Oh, and for http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2008-02/msg00219.php i'm still waiting for an answer. I just got word, that i was not the only one with this problem. I don't know, how many problems it needs to drive away people from PostgreSQL, but if we start to unsubscribe people from the mailinglists, most of them won't come back. So my personal opinion is: the PostgreSQL project should have his own infractructure for mail and mailinglists, because in this case the sysadmin team can take care in case of a problem. This are just my 0.02 Euro-cent, i'm neither -core nor -www, i'm just *censored* about the current situation. Kind regards -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum German PostgreSQL User Group European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors