Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3462E003A for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:42 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57559-03 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:40 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DC92E0030 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-66-43.bk5-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.66.43]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2MHe7U8020140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:40:10 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91F0247BFE; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300 (CLST) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure Message-ID: <20080322173934.GB11732@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <937d27e10803220907v4d916d6dr32be3fa9a4a3129a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <937d27e10803220907v4d916d6dr32be3fa9a4a3129a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/489 X-Sequence-Number: 14608 Dave Page wrote: > I propose that we build a replacement mail system, tailored to our > needs. This would be built on our existing FreeBSD infrastructure and > would be managed by members of the existing sysadmin team including > myself, Magnus, Stefan and Marc. Further, it has been suggested that > OmniTI may be able to offer assistance. > > Can I please get a show of hands for and against progressing with such > a project? +1 to the project -- assuming that it means a change of infrastructure and not necessarily of tools. I, for one, would oppose changing Mj2 for Mailman, for instance. (However, whether we use Sendmail or Postfix or something else entirely I don't care ...) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.