Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071E2E0051 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:02:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08196-05 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:02:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from roadrunner.wars-nicht.de (roadrunner.wars-nicht.de [88.198.26.233]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E50C2E0054 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:02:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from iridium.wars-nicht.de (Qd5df.q.pppool.de [89.53.213.223]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by roadrunner.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0BD9D421E for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:02:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from iridium.home (iridium.wars-nicht.de [127.0.0.1]) by iridium.wars-nicht.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346123DCFE8 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:02:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:02:22 +0100 From: Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure Message-ID: <20080322190222.2eda42ae@iridium.home> In-Reply-To: <20080322104827.58cc0436@commandprompt.com> References: <937d27e10803220907v4d916d6dr32be3fa9a4a3129a@mail.gmail.com> <20080322173934.GB11732@alvh.no-ip.org> <20080322104827.58cc0436@commandprompt.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/492 X-Sequence-Number: 14611 On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:48:27 -0700 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:39:34 -0300 > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > +1 to the project -- assuming that it means a change of infrastructure > > and not necessarily of tools. I, for one, would oppose changing Mj2 > > for Mailman, for instance. (However, whether we use Sendmail or > > Postfix or something else entirely I don't care ...) > > Actually this is a good point. We really should define requirements as > part of this, let's not just do it wholesale. I'm first for checking, if we find an agreement about either creating a new mail infrastructure, stabilizing the current situation or (which i would find pity) doing nothing at all. The next step, if any, would be to find out, if we need a new domain. Because in case of a new domain we have a lot more problems to solve than just the question which software to use. > * Environment must be managed by the community I would say, this question is implicated. If we vote for a new mail infrastructure, this surely not means to give away this infrastructure into the hands of another company, or? Or? > * Attempt to have admins in each of the following timezones > EST > PST > CET That's a job for the sysadmin team, not to discuss here. If we need more helping hands in this team, this can be discussed and solved in another thread. > * FreeBSD is OS? Same thing -> sysadmin team. So let's stay on topic. If we have a decision we can create other mail threads and discuss the details. Thank you & kind regards -- Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum German PostgreSQL User Group European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors