Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354D02E0037 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20834-05 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7352E002C for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312991688664 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20790-05; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-7-245-234.eastlink.ca [71.7.245.234]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000BF168864C; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCCE4926B; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:19 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:43:19 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Magnus Hagander cc: Dave Page , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: postgresql.org mail infrastructure In-Reply-To: <47E5838A.4090908@hagander.net> Message-ID: <20080322194227.W34676@fserv.hub.org> References: <937d27e10803220907v4d916d6dr32be3fa9a4a3129a@mail.gmail.com> <1206216556.15438.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080322175727.Y34676@fserv.hub.org> <937d27e10803221413qbcb12bfq5c1dd74b82ae1fbf@mail.gmail.com> <20080322183108.Y34676@fserv.hub.org> <20080322184854.F34676@fserv.hub.org> <47E5838A.4090908@hagander.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/507 X-Sequence-Number: 14626 On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Just a short top-post here ... as I mentioned before, Dave/Tom/I have been >> discussing this issue on -core, with it degenerating to 'Dave/I' ... we >> have a plan to move forward on this based on discussions that actually >> happened a couple of weeks ago as a percursor to this ... >> >> Dave/I will be posting a summary of our scheduale/plan to sysadmins later >> this evening, as this is an infrastructure, not WWW, issue ... >> >> Thank you ... > > Thanks Marc! I appreciate seeing this move forward! NP ... I hadn't even realized that our previous talks on this *had* stalled, but I suspect Bruce missed that thread and jump'd in between us having an agreed on target, and actually implementing it ... It happens.