Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FA72E006C for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:14:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26881-10 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:14:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0492E0060 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:14:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03B5DCC9DE; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:14:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mha-laptop (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE941FF09C; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:15:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:15:55 +0100 From: Magnus Hagander To: Robert Treat Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, "Joshua D. Drake" , "Greg Sabino Mullane" Subject: Re: Another summerofcode.html update Message-ID: <20080327101555.790f29c6@mha-laptop> In-Reply-To: <200803262307.17165.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> References: <200803252132.51463.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <160a93a3fa789a18fd38d53c16b0fd95@biglumber.com> <20080325185356.130abd09@jd-laptop> <200803262307.17165.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200803/602 X-Sequence-Number: 14721 Robert Treat wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:53, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:50:47 -0000 > > > > "Greg Sabino Mullane" wrote: > > > > AFICT this was committed, but no follow-up was posted saying > > > > so... in the future let's all remember to follow-up when we > > > > apply. Thank you for your support. > > > > > > Isn't that what post-commit hooks automagically sending mail is > > > for? > > > > Yes. I am not sure which followup we are looking for. I received > > notification today. Robert are you not on > > pgweb@pgweb.postgresql.org? > > > sure, but those messages are not threaded to original requests, and > i'd suspect not everyone who submits a patch is subscribed there. I agree with Robert here - having a quick "applied, thanks" note appear in the proper thread makes it a *lot* easier to figure out which things can be removed from the local shame-list of stuff that needs to be applied. //Magnus