Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284E92E0073 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:42:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05576-01 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:42:40 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from svr2.hagander.net (svr2.hagander.net [88.198.128.226]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15B52E0056 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:42:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dynamic.hagander.net ([127.0.0.1]) (encrypted and authenticated) by svr2.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B51BDCCA42; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mha-laptop (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mha-laptop.hagander.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF71FF1D8; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:30:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:30:02 +0200 From: Magnus Hagander To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: "Dave Page" , "PostgreSQL www" Subject: Re: Mailing list lists Message-ID: <20080403153002.22e8580b@mha-laptop> In-Reply-To: <20080403062827.2e283093@commandprompt.com> References: <937d27e10804030339u4cd97cfmcf6a84da95c077e@mail.gmail.com> <20080403062827.2e283093@commandprompt.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/18 X-Sequence-Number: 14766 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:39:04 +0100 > "Dave Page" wrote: > > > We seem to have at least 2 lists of mailing lists, which are out of > > sync: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ > > http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/ > > > > Should we just redirect the latter to the former? > > > > The archives list looks a little out of date as well - there only > > seem to be 3 pugs listed for example. Can someone fix that please? > > > > Thanks. > > > > This is actually an open thread dave :P. I brought this up before > EAST. My thought was to modify the main .Org site to be the > authoritative reference and have the front page of archives point > there. I believe that is the current idea, yes. AFAIK, it's currently sitting on Alvaros table.... :-P The data is in a database these days. Alvaro was going to modify the archives pages to pull it's data from the database, and to somehow warn us if it goes out of sync with majordomo wrt which lists exists (since it can also see the raw majordomo data). //Magnus