Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:10:22 -0700
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Databasing sponsors
Message-ID: <20080404041022.69674a92@commandprompt.com>
In-Reply-To: <200804040112.42916.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <20080403101150.56301a10@commandprompt.com>
	<200804031615.46168.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<20080403182206.7e05ed87@commandprompt.com>
	<200804040112.42916.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Organization: Command Prompt, Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 01:12:42 -0400
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> > > I'd like to expand this system to cover doing the full sponsor
> > > breakdown we discussed and approved 1.5 years ago but never
> > > implemented.  So as long as I can stuff giving categories into
> >
> > Let's not get ahead of ourselves. It was discussed, it was never
> > approved and as you are fully aware I had reservations about it.
> > Further later in conversations we discussed a different scenario.
> > However, this is a technical discussion and we can get into those
> > details later.
> >
> 
> It's not clear to me that you haven't already opened this up by
> adding the stype field.  I don't see anything on the current sponsors
> page that indicates what type of sponsor people are, so you've made a
> subtle but substantive change to the system defining the schema as
> you did.  
> 

Categorization is going to happen. The question is how, which is not a
question for this thread.

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate