Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:33:51 -0400
From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Databasing sponsors
In-reply-to: <20080404041457.056f37a3@commandprompt.com>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, josh@agliodbs.com
Message-id: <200804040833.51960.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
References: <20080403101150.56301a10@commandprompt.com>
	<20080404041022.69674a92@commandprompt.com>
	<20080404041457.056f37a3@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1

On Friday 04 April 2008 07:14, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 04:10:22 -0700
>
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > Categorization is going to happen. The question is how, which is not a
> > question for this thread.
>
> Or more to the point, I really don't want to clutter of a technical
> discussion with something that belongs on advocacy (or somewhere else).
> For the categorization we need a name and a sort order at a minimum. So
> that is what I want to put in place for now.
>
> When we hammer out "what" the categorization is going to be, we can
> implement the actual changes.
>

But to implement the current setup, we don't need any of that (we can sort by 
name only), so we should probably leave out the categorization untill we 
actually know what that should look like.  

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL